Vol. 29 No. 1 (2014)
Published June 2, 2014
How to Cite
Garcia, A., Abrego, J., & Calvillo, M. M. (2014). A Study of Hybrid Instructional Delivery for Graduate Students in an Educational Leadership Course. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education / Revue Internationale Du E-Learning Et La Formation à Distance, 29(1). Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/864
AbstractThis paper describes a qualitative study in which ways to improve instructional delivery for graduate students in an Educational Leadership course in Master of Education program in a predominantly Hispanic university located in South Texas were examined. Questions explored perceptions, attitudes, and reasons for choosing a hybrid instructional delivery model. Five themes emerged from the data: flexibility, assumption of responsibility in learning, emphasis on active learning, building peer relationships, and deepened learning.
- Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
- Akyol, Z., Garrison, D. R., & Ozden, M. Y. (2009). Online and Blended Communities of Inquiry: Exploring the Developmental and Perceptional Differences. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 10(6), 65-83.
- AYTAÇ, T. (2009). The influence of blended learning model on development leadership skills of school administrators. Paper presented at the Special issue on ICIT 2009 conference-applied computing, Ankara, Turkey.
- Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Doering, A. (2006). Adventure learning: Transformative hybrid online education. Distance Education, 27, 197–215.
- Finn, A., & Bucceri, M. (2004).A case study approach to blended learning, retrieved January 15, 2013 from http://www.centra.com/download/whitepapers/CaseStudy_BlendedLearning.pdf.
- Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online Community of Inquiry review: Social, cognitive and teaching presence Issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 61-72.
- Garnham, C. & Kaleta, R. (2002). Introduction to hybrid courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(10).
- Glass, J. & Sue, V. (2008). Preferences, satisfaction, and perceived learning in an online mathematics class. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching Student, 4(3).
- Ku, H.Y., Akarasrisworn, C., Rice. Lisa A., Glassmeyer, D. & Mendoza, B. (2011).Teaching an online graduate mathematics education course in for in-service mathematics teachers. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(2),135–147.
- Langley, A. (2007). “Experiential learning, e-learning and social learning: the EES approach to developing blended Learning” The Fourth Education in a Changing Environment Conference Book, Edited by Eamon O’Doherty, İnforming Science Press, pp.171-172.
- Li, C. S., & Irby, B. (2008). An overview of online education: Attractiveness, challenges, concerns, and recommendations. College Student Journal, 42 (2), 449-458.
- Liu, X., Magjuka, R.J., Bonk, C.J., & Lee, S.-H. (2007). Does sense of community matter? An examination of participants’ perceptions of building learning communities in online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(1), 9-24.
- Marder, T. J & de Bettencourt, L.U. (2012). Using a hybrid model to prepare special educators to teach students identified with ASD Rural. Special education Quarterly, 31(3), 12-19.
- Morris, L. V., & Finnegan, C. L. (2008). Best practices in predicting and encouraging student persistence and achievement online. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 10(1), 55-64.
- Mupinga, D. M., Nora, R. T. & Yaw, D. C. (2006). The learning styles, expectations, and needs of online students. College Teaching, 54(1), 185–189.
- Oh, E., & Park, S. (2009). How are universities involved in blended instruction? Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 327– 342.
- Offenholley, K. (2006). Threaded discussion: “Life-blood” of online math courses. Online Classroom, 2, 8.
- Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park; London: SAGE
- Penny, L., & Murphy, E. (2009). Rubrics for designing and evaluating online asynchronous discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), 804-820.
- Rovai, A.P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319-332.
- Rovai, A. P., & Grooms, L. D. (2004). The relationship of personality-based learning style preferences and learning among online graduate students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(1), 30-47.
- Yang, C. & Chang, Y. S. (2012). Assessing the effects of interactive blogging on student attitudes towards peer interaction, learning motivation, and academic achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 126–135.
- Zacharis, N.Z., (2011). The effect of learning style on preference for web-based courses and learning outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5).