Vol. 38 No. 1 (2023)
Research Articles

First-Year Student's E-Readiness to Use Learning Management System: COVID-19 Realities

Ramashego Shila Mphahlele
University of South Africa
Bio
Phumza Makgato-Khunou
University of South Africa
Bio
Geoffrey Tshephe
University of South Africa
Bio
Mantsose Jane Sethusha
University of South Africa
Bio
Matlakalana Mpho Tshesane
University of South Africa
Bio
Richard Wright
University of South Africa
Bio
Chetty Denzil
University of South Africa
Bio

Published 2023-11-06

How to Cite

Mphahlele, R. S., Makgato-Khunou, P., Tshephe, G., Sethusha, M. J., Tshesane, M. M., Wright, R., & Denzil, C. (2023). First-Year Student’s E-Readiness to Use Learning Management System: COVID-19 Realities. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education Revue Internationale Du E-Learning Et La Formation à Distance, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.55667/10.55667/ijede.2023.v38.i1.1266

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly impacted higher education institutions worldwide, prompting a rapid shift towards online
learning environments. This study aims to assess the e-readiness of first-year students in using the Learning Management System (LMS) in the context of COVID-19. The researchers used the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) framework to understand the first-year students’ acceptance and adoption of technology, focusing on perceived usefulness and ease of use. This study employed a concurrent mixed methods approach: To what extent were University of South Africa (UNISA) first-year students e-ready to use the LMS for engaging in online teaching, learning, and assessment activities during the COVID-19 pandemic? A sample of 2,707 first-year students and 30 academics from diverse academic disciplines was selected from nine colleges of the South African Open, Distance, and e-Learning (ODeL) institution during the years 2020 and 2021. The study evaluated the students’ technological proficiency, digital literacy skills, access to digital devices and the internet, and their perceptions and attitudes towards online learning and assessment. The study explored students’ experiences, motivations, and barriers to effectively using an LMS for engaging in online teaching, learning and assessment activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Preliminary findings indicated that while many first-year
students had basic digital skills and access to the necessary technological resources, many faced challenges in adapting to online
learning environments. These challenges included limited internet connectivity, lack of technical support, difficulties in managing time and motivation, and unfamiliarity with LMS resources and activities. However, students also expressed positive attitudes towards the flexibility and accessibility offered by online learning, appreciating the convenience and diverse learning resources available through an LMS. The outcomes of this research will inform educators, administrators, and policy-makers in developing strategies to enhance first-year students’ e-readiness and improve the implementation of online teaching, learning, and assessment activities. Addressing the identified challenges can lead to a more inclusive and effective learning environment, ensuring equitable access to education amidst the ongoing COVID-19 realities.
Keywords: COVID-19, digital literacy, e-Readiness, First-year students, online learning, Open-Distance and e-Learning, Technology Acceptance Model

L’état de cyberpréparation des étudiants à l’utilisation du système de gestion de l’apprentissage : contexte de la COVID-19

Résumé : La pandémie de la COVID-19 a profondément changé la culture dans le monde des établissements d’enseignement supérieur et a accéléré la transition vers des environnements d’apprentissage en ligne. Cette étude a pour objectif d’évaluer l’état de cyberpréparation des étudiants de première année universitaire à l’ut du système de gestion de l’apprentissage (SGA) dans le contexte de la COVID-19. Les chercheurs ont utilisé comme cadre, le modèle d’acceptation de la technologie (MAT), afin de comprendre le degré d’acceptation et d’adoption de la technologie par les étudiants en ciblant leur perception sur sa facilité d’utilisation et son utilité. Cette étude utilise une approche de méthodes mixtes simultanées : Dans quelle mesure les étudiants de première année de l’Université d’Afrique du Sud (UNISA) sont-ils préparés au numérique pour utiliser le SGA et s’intéresser aux activités d’enseignement, d’apprentissage et d’évaluation en ligne durant la pandémie de la COVID-19? Un échantillon de 2 707 étudiants de
première année provenant de 30 universités et de différentes disciplines a été sélectionné à partir de neuf (9) collèges participants de
l’Institut pour une collectivité ouverte, à distance et en ligne (IODL) de l’Université d’Afrique du Sud, pendant les années 2020 et 2021. L’étude évalue l’aptitude à la technologie, les habiletés numériques, l’accessibilité aux outils technologiques et à l’Internet ainsi que leur perception et leur attitude face à l’apprentissage et l’évaluation en ligne. Elle analyse également les expériences, la motivation et les barrières d’une utilisation efficace du SGA pour s’engager dans les activités d’enseignement, d’apprentissage et d’évaluation en ligne durant la pandémie de la COVID-19. Les résultats préliminaires indiquent qu’alors que plusieurs étudiants de première année possèdent des habiletés numériques de base et ont accès aux ressources technologiques essentielles, plusieurs d’entre eux ont des difficultés d’adaptation aux environnements d’apprentissage en ligne. Ces difficultés comprennent la qualité de la connexion à Internet, le manque de soutien technique, celles de gérer leur temps et leur motivation ainsi que le manque de familiarité avec les ressources et les activités du SGA. Cependant, les étudiants ont aussi exprimé une attitude positive envers la flexibilité et l’accessibilité que l’apprentissage en ligne peut offrir, de même qu’ils ont apprécié les avantages et la diversité des ressources offertes par
un SGA. Les constats de cette recherche vont permettre de renseigner les éducateurs, les administrateurs et les décideurs dans le
développement de stratégies pour accroître l’état de cyberpréparation des étudiants de première année et améliorer l’implantation des activités d’enseignement, d’apprentissage et d’évaluation en ligne. Agir face aux défis identifiés ne peut que conduire vers un environnement d’apprentissage plus inclusif et plus efficace, assurant ainsi un accès équitable à l’éducation dans la continuité des réalités de la COVID-19.
Mots-clés : COVID-19, habileté numérique, état de cyberpréparation, étudiants de première année universitaire, apprentissage en ligne, collectivité ouverte, à distance et en ligne, modèle d’acceptation de la technologie

References

  1. Abdulwahid, H. S., Salman, M. K., & Ouda, A. J. (2019, August 22). Identify and assessing the e-readiness of public organizations (case study in Iraq). The 7th International Conference on Applied Science and Technology, Karbala City, Iraq. Vol. 2144, Issue 1. 050006. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5123122
  2. Adams, D., Sumintono, B., Mohamed, A., Syafika, N., & Noor, M. (2018, December). E-learning readiness among students of diverse backgrounds in a leading Malaysian higher education institution. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 15(2), 227–256. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ121661.pdf
  3. Al Rawashdeh, A. Z., Mohammed, E. Y., Al Arab, A. R., Alara, M., Al-Rawashdeh, B., & Al-Rawashdeh, B. (2021). Advantages and disadvantages of using e-learning in university education: Analyzing students’ perspectives. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 19(3), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.19.3.2168
  4. Al-Rikabi, Y. K., & Montazer, G. A. (2023). Designing an e-learning readiness assessment model for Iraqi universities employing Fuzzy Delphi Method. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11889-0
  5. Alsobhi, A., Meccawy, M., & Meccawy, Z. (2021, May 24). The impacts of e-learning readiness in higher education during COVID 19 pandemic. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 12(7), 1–12. https://tuengr.com/V12/12A7S.pdf
  6. Amadu, L., Syed Muhammad, S., Mohammed, A. S., Owusu, G., & Lukman, S. (2018). Using technology acceptance model to measure the e[a]se of social media for collaborative learning in Ghana. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(4), 321. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.383
  7. Azhari, F. A., & Ming, L. C. (2015, May 25). Review of e-learning practice at the tertiary education level in Malaysia. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 49(4), 248–257. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.49.4.2
  8. Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & del Rosario, L. S. (2021, May 28). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7321–7338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x
  9. Bell, R., Warren, V., & Schmidt, R. (2022). The application of concurrent or sequential mixed-methods research designs and their methodological implications: Investigating tacit knowledge, its use, and application in automotive development. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529604474
  10. Bradley, V. M. (2021). Learning management system (LMS) use with online instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.36
  11. Brancati, D. (2018). Social scientific research. SAGE. http://www.dawnbrancati.com/Brancati_SSR_excerpt.pdf
  12. Braxton, J. M. (2019). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition by Vincent Tinto. Journal of College Student Development, 60(1), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2019.0012
  13. Coman, C., Țîru, L. G., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M. C. (2020, December 11). Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: Students’ perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(24), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410367
  14. Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results [Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/15192
  15. Davis, F. D. (1989, September). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  16. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
  17. Ferrari, R. (2015, December 23). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615z.000000000329
  18. Gamage, S. H. P. W., Ayres, J. R., Behrend, M. B., & Smith, E. J. (2019, August 13). Optimising Moodle quizzes for online assessments. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0181-4
  19. Goldberg, C. (2020, August 13). 5 Benefits of open educational resources. Best Practices, Education, Resources. Retrieved October 12, 2023, from https://blogs.onlineeducation.touro.edu/5-benefits-of-open-educational-resources/
  20. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
  21. Harrell, S., & Bynum, Y. (2018). Factors affecting technology integration in the classroom. Alabama Journal of Educational Leadership, 5(1), 12–18. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1194723.pdf
  22. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 3. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
  23. Hollister, B., Nair, P., Hill-Lindsay, S., & Chukoskie, L. (2022, May 9). Engagement in online learning: Student attitudes and behavior during COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.851019
  24. Kaushik, M. K., & Agrawal, D. (2021). Influence of technology readiness in adoption of e-learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(2), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2020-0216
  25. Kim, H. J., Hong, A. J., & Song, H.-D. (2019). The roles of academic engagement and digital readiness in students’ achievements in university e-learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(21), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0152-3
  26. Kokoç, M. (2019, December 20). Flexibility in e-Learning: Modelling its relation to behavioral engagement and academic performance. Themes in eLearning, 12, 1-16. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1347-8033
  27. Letseka, M., Letseka, M. M., & Pitsoe, V. (2018, November 5). The challenges of e-learning in South Africa. Trends in E-learning, 8, 121-138. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74843
  28. Lilian, A. (2022, November 30). Motivational beliefs, an important contrivance in elevating digital literacy among university students. Heliyon, 8(12), e11913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11913
  29. Marín, V. I. (2022, March 7). Student-centred learning in higher education in times of Covid-19: A critical analysis. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.be17c279
  30. Mohd Basar, Z., Mansor, A. N., Jamaludin, K. A., & Alias, B. S. (2021, July). The effectiveness and challenges of online learning for secondary school students – A case study. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(3), 119. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i3.14514
  31. Mousavi Sahebalzamani, S. S., Faghihzadeh, S., Ojaghloo, S., & Noroozi, M. (2016). Assess the readiness of e-learning in the students of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Medical Education Development, 8(20), 115–124.
  32. Mphahlele, R. S. (2023). Online learning support in a ubiquitous learning environment. In G. Durak & S. Çankaya (Eds.), Research anthology on remote teaching and learning and the future of online education (pp. 1265–1281). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7540-9.ch062
  33. Msila, V. (2021, May). Digitization and decolonizing education: A qualitative study of the University of South Africa (UNISA) Leadership. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(11).
  34. Mugo, D. G., Njagi, K., Chemwei, B., & Motanya, J. O. (2017, February 8). The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and its application to the utilization of mobile learning technologies. British Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science, 20(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMCS/2017/29015
  35. Nasiri, F. S., Ghanbari, S., Ardalan, M. R., & Karimi, I. (2014). Effect of infrastructure and faculty readiness in effective implementation of e-learning based on technology acceptance model (TAM). Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, 7(5), 329–338. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Effect-of-Infrastructure-and-Faculty-Readiness-in-Nasiri-Ghanbari/9ebc833e184ab12e44e51c566b1d427686fd24cb
  36. Pherali, T. (2022). Conflict, education and peace in Nepal: Rebuilding education for peace and development. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN: 9781350028753
  37. Protection of Personal Information Act. (2019). Republic of South Africa. https://popia.co.za/act/
  38. Ranganathan, H., Singh, D. K. A., Kumar, S., Sharma, S., Chua, S. K., Ahmad, N. B., & Harikrishnan, K. (2021, July 10). Readiness towards online learning among physiotherapy undergraduates. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 376. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02803-8
  39. Rotar, O. (2022, January 6). Online student support: a framework for embedding support interventions into the online learning cycle. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00178-4
  40. Ryder, R., & Machajewski, S. (2017). The “UIC German” game app for the enhancement of foreign language learning – Case study. International Journal of Educational Technology, 4(1), 1-16. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1167317.pdf
  41. Soler Costa, R., Tan, Q., Pivot, F., Zhang, X., & Wang, H. (2021, September). Personalized and adaptive learning. Texto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnologia, 14(3), e33445. https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2021.33445
  42. Veluvali, P., & Surisetti, J. (2022). Learning management system for greater learner engagement in higher education – A review. Higher Education for the Future, 9(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/23476311211049855
  43. Wagiran, W., Suharjana, S., Nurtanto, M., & Mutohhari, F. (2022, October 18). Determining the e-learning readiness of higher education students: A study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon, 8(10), e11160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11160
  44. Wang, C.-Y., Zhang, Y.-Y., & Chen, S.-C. (2021). The empirical study of college students’ e-learning effectiveness and its antecedents toward the COVID-19 epidemic environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.573590
  45. Yang, C., & Xu, D. (2023, May 8). Predicting student and instructor e-readiness and promoting e-learning success in online EFL class during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case from China. PLOS ONE, 18(5), e0284334. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284334
  46. Zine, M., Harrou, F., Terbeche, M., Bellahcene, M., Dairi, A., & Sun, Y. (2023). E-learning readiness assessment using machine learning methods. Sustainability, 15(11), 8924. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118924