Vol. 38 No. 1 (2023)
Research Articles

The experience of BAME students on a psychology undergraduate dissertation module

Sharon Xuereb
The Open University
Bio

Published 2023-09-08

How to Cite

Xuereb, S. (2023). The experience of BAME students on a psychology undergraduate dissertation module. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education Revue Internationale Du E-Learning Et La Formation à Distance, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.55667/10.55667/ijede.2023.v38.i1.1290

Abstract

Abstract: In higher education in the United Kingdom (UK), students from ethnic minorities get lower grades than White students. This study focused on the experiences of Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME) students completing an undergraduate psychology dissertation module. Self-determination theory (Ryan & Deci, 2000) and intersectionality (Crenshaw, 1989) underpinned this study. A reflexive thematic analysis (Braun & Clark, 2006) methodology was used. Eleven BAME students engaged in individual interviews about their lived experience when completing an undergraduate psychology dissertation module. Participants spoke about the following five themes: module content, tutor, project, other students, and ethnicity. Participants who wanted to research ethnicity-focused topics had tutors with insufficient understanding of the topic. When interacting with tutors and peers, participants stopped to consider whether their ethnicity would negatively impact how they were perceived. They reported challenges in understanding the material and engaging in academic discussions, and they spoke about inconsistency amongst tutors. Students discussed how locating the relevant information took up time, which was particularly worrying for students with work or family commitments. These findings indicate that universities should diversify their staff and student pool and ensure students have access to supportive and effective tutors. Students should be sufficiently prepared for the dissertation module, and assessment and marking guidance should be communicated clearly to both tutors and students. Furthermore, module materials should capture achievements of minority populations.

Keywords: BAME students; awarding gap; undergraduate dissertation

L'expériences des étudiants NAME qui terminent un module de dissertation de premier cycle en psychologie

Sharon Xuereb

Résumé : Dans l'enseignement supérieur au Royaume-Uni, les étudiants issus de minorités ethniques obtiennent des notes inférieures à celles des étudiants blancs. Cette étude se concentre sur les expériences des étudiants noirs, asiatiques et issus de minorités ethniques (NAME) qui suivent un module de mémoire de psychologie de premier cycle. La théorie de l'autodétermination (Ryan & Deci, 2000) et l'intersectionnalité (Crenshaw, 1989) ont été les fondements de cette étude. Une méthodologie d'analyse thématique et réflexive (Braun & Clark, 2006) a été utilisée. Onze étudiants NAME ont participé à des entretiens individuels sur leur expérience vécue lors de la réalisation d'un module de dissertation en psychologie. Les participants ont abordé les cinq thèmes suivants : le contenu du module, le tuteur, le projet, les autres étudiants et l'ethnicité. Les participants qui voulaient faire des recherches sur des sujets axés sur l'ethnicité ont eu des tuteurs qui ne comprenaient pas suffisamment le sujet. Lors des interactions avec les tuteurs et les pairs, les participants se sont arrêtés pour se demander si leur appartenance ethnique pouvait avoir un impact négatif sur la façon dont ils étaient perçus. Ils ont fait état de difficultés à comprendre la matière et à s'engager dans des discussions académiques, et ils ont parlé de l'incohérence des tuteurs. Les étudiants ont expliqué que la recherche des informations pertinentes leur prenait du temps, ce qui était particulièrement préoccupant pour les étudiants ayant des obligations professionnelles ou familiales. Ces résultats indiquent que les universités devraient diversifier leur personnel et leur vivier d'étudiants et veiller à ce que les étudiants aient accès à des tuteurs efficaces et compréhensifs. Les étudiants devraient être suffisamment préparés pour le module de mémoire, et les conseils en matière d'évaluation et de notation devraient être communiqués clairement aux tuteurs et aux étudiants. En outre, les supports des modules devraient faire état des accomplissements des populations minoritaires.

Mots-clés : Étudiants NAME ; differences de valorisation ; mémoire de premier cycle

References

  1. Akel, S. (2019, October). Insider-outsider: The role of race in shaping the experiences of black and minority ethnic students. Goldsmiths, University of London. https://www.gold.ac.uk/media/docs/reports/Insider-Outsider-Report-191008.pdf
  2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006, January). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
  5. Bunce, L., King, N., Saran, S., & Talib, N. (2021). Experiences of black and minority ethnic (BME) students in higher education: applying self-determination theory to understand the BME attainment gap. Studies in Higher Education, 46(3), 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1643305
  6. Cousin, G., & Cureton, D. (2012, October). Disparities in student attainment (DISA). University of Wolverhampton and University of Coventry. https://wlv.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/2436/621981/Cureton%20report.pdf
  7. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1(8), 139–167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf
  8. Darvin, R. (2019). Youth, technology, and the hidden curriculum of the 21st century. Youth and Globalization, 1(2), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1163/25895745-00102002
  9. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
  10. Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020, May). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS ONE, 15(5), 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076
  11. Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA). (2023, January 31). What are HE students' progression rates and qualifications? https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/students/outcomes
  12. Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016, February). The relation of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: a systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002
  13. Jones, S., Pampaka, M., Swain, D., & Skyme, J. (2017). Contextualising degree-level achievement: an exploration of interactions between gender, ethnicity, socio-economic status and school type at one large UK university. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 22(4), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2017.1381287
  14. Kotera, Y., Cockerill, V., Green, P., Hutchinson, L., Shaw, P., & Bowskill, N. (2019). Towards another kind of borderlessness: online students with disabilities. Distance Education, 40(2), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1600369
  15. Mountford-Zimdars, A., Sabri, D., Moore, J., Sanders, J., Jones, S., & Higham, L. (2015, July). Causes of differences in student outcomes. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/23653/1/HEFCE2015_diffout.pdf
  16. Nguyen, Q., Rienties, B., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2020). Learning analytics to uncover inequality in behavioural engagement and academic attainment in a distance learning setting. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 594–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1679088
  17. Richardson, J. T. E., Alden Rivers, B., & Whitelock, D. (2015). The role of feedback in the under-attainment of ethnic minority students: evidence from distance education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.938317
  18. Runnymede Trust. (2014, June). When education isn't enough: labour market outcomes of ethnic minority graduates at elite universities. University of Manchester. https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/files/32384347/FULL_TEXT.PDF
  19. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  20. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020, April). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
  21. Stevenson, J. (2012, October). Black and minority ethnic student degree retention and attainment. The Higher Education Academy. https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/bme_summit_final_report_1568036653.pdf
  22. Webb, J., Arthur, R., McFarlane-Edmond, P., Burns, T., & Warren, D. (2022). An evaluation of the experiences of the hidden curriculum of Black and minority ethnic undergraduate health and social care students at a London university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(3), 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1915967
  23. Zamecnik, A., Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., & Liu, L. (2022). Exploring non-traditional learner motivations and characteristics in online learning: a learner profile study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3,(100051). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100051