Vol. 39 No. 2 (2024)
Research Articles

The Digital inclusion of disabled students in Open and Distance e-Learning: Going beyond access to empowerment

Ndakaitei Manase
University of South Africa, Institute for Open and Distance Learning
Bio

Published 2025-02-27

How to Cite

Manase, N. (2025). The Digital inclusion of disabled students in Open and Distance e-Learning: Going beyond access to empowerment. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education Revue Internationale Du E-Learning Et La Formation à Distance, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.55667/10.55667/ijede.2024.v39.i2.1343

Abstract

The digital inclusion of students with learning disabilities in Open and Distance e-Learning (ODeL) requires more than just providing; it must also focus on empowering these students. This paper argues that true inclusion enables students to actively engage in processes that address their unique needs and foster responsibility for participation and success in a digital learning environment. The paper emphasises that empowerment goes beyond providing the necessary technology and internet connectivity. It involves training students in digital technologies, mentoring them to build confidence, encouraging self-advocacy, exercising agency in their learning, involving them in plans and processes that aim to address their needs, and providing accessible information and inclusive pedagogy. Using the Capability Approach, a human development framework that emphasises providing people with alternative practical opportunities to achieve valued outcomes, this conceptual paper offers a better and more nuanced understanding of empowerment in the context of disability and digital inclusion. The Capability Approach allows an assessment of how well a person can function and achieve meaningful outcomes with the available resources, which is critical to empowering students with learning disabilities and addressing their specific needs. This research seeks to address technological, social, and practical barriers and offers practical recommendations for ODeL institutions to enhance the digital inclusion of students with learning disabilities. The study is significant in its potential to inspire positive change in how well ODeL institutions support students with learning disabilities to ensure that they are not only included, but also empowered to succeed in their studies.

Keywords: access, digital inclusion, empowerment, inclusion, learning disabilities, Open and Distance e-Learning

L'inclusion numerique des etudiants en situation de handicap d'apprentissage dans la formation ouverte et a distance (FOAD) : Aller au-dela de l'acces vers l'autonomisation

Resume : L'inclusion numerique des etudiants en situation de handicap d'apprentissage dans la formation ouverte et a distance (FOAD) ne se limite pas a leur donner acces a des ressources numeriques; elle doit egalement viser leur autonomisation. Cet article soutient qu'une veritable inclusion permet aux etudiants de s'engager activement dans des processus repondant a leurs besoins specifiques, tout en leur conferant la responsabilite de leur participation et de leur reussite dans un environnement d'apprentissage numerique. L'autonomisation va au-dela de la mise a disposition des technologies et de la connectivite Internet. Elle implique la formation aux technologies numeriques, le mentorat pour renforcer la confiance en soi, l'encouragement a l'auto-representation, le developpement de l'agentivite dans l'apprentissage, l'implication des etudiants dans l'elaboration des plans et processus visant a repondre a leurs besoins, ainsi que l'acces a une information accessible et a des approches pedagogiques inclusives. S'appuyant sur l'Approche par les Capabilites, un cadre de developpement humain mettant l'accent sur la mise a disposition d'opportunites pratiques alternatives pour atteindre des resultats valorises, cet article conceptuel propose une comprehension plus nuancee de l'autonomisation dans le contexte du handicap et de l'inclusion numerique. Cette approche permet d'evaluer dans quelle mesure une personne peut fonctionner et atteindre des resultats significatifs avec les ressources disponibles, un aspect crucial pour autonomiser les etudiants en situation de handicap d'apprentissage et repondre a leurs besoins specifiques. Cette recherche vise a identifier les obstacles technologiques, sociaux et pratiques et a formuler des recommandations concretes pour les institutions de formation ouverte et a distance (FOAD) afin d'ameliorer l'inclusion numerique des etudiants en situation de handicap d'apprentissage. Cette etude est particulierement importante en raison de son potentiel a inspirer des changements positifs dans la maniere dont ces institutions soutiennent ces etudiants, en veillant a ce qu'ils ne soient pas seulement inclus, mais egalement rendus plus autonomes pour reussir leurs etudes.

Mots-cles : acces, inclusion numerique, autonomisation, inclusion, handicap d'apprentissage, formation ouverte et a distance (FOAD).

References

  1. Abbasi Kasani, H., Shams Mourkani, G., Seraji, F., Rezaeizadeh, M., & Abedi, H. (2020). E-learning challenges in Iran: A research synthesis. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(4), 96-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i4.4677
  2. Abdulmughni, S. A. S., & Al-Abyadh, M. H. A. (2023). How well can educational empowerment affect Saudi Women's quality of life? The roles of decision making power and the economic implications. Journal of Educational and Human Sciences, (22), 81-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.33193/JEAHS.22.2023.344
  3. Ahmed, R., & Hyndman-Rizk, N. (2020). The higher education paradox: Towards improving women's empowerment, agency development and labour force participation in Bangladesh. Gender and Education, 32(4), 447-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2018.1471452
  4. Al Otaiba, S., & Petscher, Y. (2020). Identifying and serving students with learning disabilities, including dyslexia, in the context of multitiered supports and response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(5), 327-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219420943691
  5. Alamri, A., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2017). Factors affecting learners with disabilities-instructor interaction in online learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(2), 59-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0162643416681497
  6. Alhassan, M. D., & Adam, I. O. (2021). The effects of digital inclusion and ICT access on quality of life: A global perspective. Technology in Society, 64, 101511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101511
  7. Alkire, S. (2008). Concepts and measures of agency. OPHI Working Paper 09, Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, University of Oxford.
  8. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
  9. Aquil, M. A. I. (2020). Diagnosis of dyscalculia: A comprehensive overview. South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 43-59. https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/sajssh/article/view/1124/1113
  10. Argyriadi, A., Vlachou, C., & Argyriadis, A. (2022). Language and cognitive deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Stress and diversity in intellectual disability studies. Review Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics, International Edition, 36(2-3), 65-71.
  11. Aro, T., Eklund, K., Eloranta, A. K., Ahonen, T., & Rescorla, L. (2022). Learning disabilities elevate children's risk for behavioral-emotional problems: Differences between LD types, genders, and contexts. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 55(6), 465-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194211056297
  12. Baguma, R., & Wolters, M. K. (2021). Making virtual learning environments accessible to people with disabilities in universities in Uganda. Frontiers in Computer Science, 3, 638275. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2021.638275
  13. Baqutayan, S. M. (2024). Malaysian women's perceptions about their autonomy: The psychological-dimensional model of women's empowerment. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 13(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJAREMS/v13-i2/21513
  14. Biggeri, M., Di Masi, D., & Bellacicco, R. (2020). Disability and higher education: Assessing students' capabilities in two Italian universities using structured focus group discussions. Studies in Higher Education, 45(4), 909-924. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1654448
  15. Bissonnette, L. A. (2006). Teaching and learning at Concordia University: Meeting the evolving education needs of faculty in providing access for university students with disabilities. [Doctoral dissertation, Concordia University).
  16. Blignaut, P., Dednam, E., & Nkalai, T. (2016). Computer ownership and usage as predictors of computer literacy of South African students. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 15(6), 638-664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15691497-12341411
  17. Bonifacci, P., Colombini, E., Marzocchi, M., Tobia, V., & Desideri, L. (2022). Textâ€toâ€speech applications to reduce mind wandering in students with dyslexia. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(2), 440-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12624
  18. Bradbrook, G., & Fisher, J. (2005). Digital equality reviewing digital inclusion activity and mapping the way forward. Media, Culture and Society.
  19. Burgstahler, S. (2020). A tutorial for making online learning accessible to students with disabilities. Disabilities, Opportunities, Internetworking, and Technology Center. University of Washington. https://www.washington.edu/doit/tutorial-makingonline-learning-accessible-students-disabilities
  20. Castellucci, G., & Singla, R. (2024). Developmental coordination disorder (Dyspraxia). In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK603724/
  21. Centre for Applied Special Technology (CAST). (2021). Universal Design for Learning guidelines, Version 3. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/
  22. Chambers, A. W. (2024). Empowering voices: An overview of self-advocacy. The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Disability, 1-9.
  23. Chigunwe, G. (2022). ODeL and inclusion of vulnerable students in higher education institutions. In C. Cuthbert (Ed.), Leading and managing Open and Distance e-Learning (ODeL) institutions in Africa (pp. 105-123). Vernon Press. https://vernonpress.com/file/18556/995d21f3c44868bd7b2e99ca5b4beb4b/1664199621.pdf
  24. Chiou, P. T., Alotaibi, A. S., & Halfond, W. G. (2021, August). Detecting and localizing keyboard accessibility failures in web applications. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (pp. 855-867). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3468264.3468581
  25. Chung, P. J., Patel, D. R., & Nizami, I. (2020). Disorder of written expression and dysgraphia: Definition, diagnosis, and management. Translational Pediatrics, 9(Suppl 1), S46. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp.2019.11.01
  26. Couzens, D., Poed, S., Kataoka, M., Brandon, A., Hartley, J., & Keen, D. (2015). Support for students with hidden disabilities in universities: A case study. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 62(1), pp. 24-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2014.984592
  27. Craig, S. L., Smith, S. J., & Frey, B. B. (2022). Professional development with universal design for learning: Supporting teachers as learners to increase the implementation of UDL. Professional Development in Education, 48(1), 22-37.
  28. Dana, A., & Christodoulides, E. (2020). The effects of a period of selected physical activity on improving manipulative and locomotors skills of children with neuropsychological learning disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research, 7(1), 25-30.
  29. Decarli, G., Sella, F., Lanfranchi, S., Gerotto, G., Gerola, S., Cossu, G., & Zorzi, M. (2023). Severe developmental dyscalculia is characterized by core deficits in both symbolic and nonsymbolic number sense. Psychological Science, 34(1), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221097947
  30. Doyle, N. (2020). Neurodiversity at work: A biopsychosocial model and the impact on working adults. British Medical Bulletin, 135(1), 108-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldaa021
  31. Drotár, P., & Dobeš, M. (2020). Dysgraphia detection through machine learning. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 21541. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-78611-9
  32. Drydrik, J. (2017). Empowerment, agency, and power. In E. Palmer (Ed.), Gender justice and development: Vulnerability and empowerment, pp. 17-30. Routledge.
  33. Erickson, M. J., & Larwin, K. H. (2016). The potential impact of online/distance education for students with disabilities in higher education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 5(1), 76-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v5i1.4525
  34. Ferguson, B. T., McKenzie, J., Dalton, E. M., & Lyner-Cleophas, M. (2019). Inclusion, universal design and universal design for learning in higher education: South Africa and the United States. African Journal of Disability, 8(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v8i0.519
  35. Firoozehchi, Z. R., Mashhadi, A., & Bigdeli, I. (2023). The comparison of sluggish cognitive tempo, processing speed, and executive functions in female children with specific learning disabilities and typically developing female children: A pilot study. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 12(1), 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2021.2007097
  36. Frediani, A. A., Peris, J., & Boni, A. (2019). Notions of empowerment and participation: Contributions from and to the capability approach. The Capability Approach, Empowerment and Participation: Concepts, Methods and Applications, 101-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-35230-9_5
  37. Genc, H., & Kocdar, S. (2020). Supporting learners with special needs in open and distance learning. In G. Durak, & S. Ankaya (Eds.), Managing and designing online courses in ubiquitous learning environments, pp. 128-151. IGI Global.
  38. Geraghty, J. R., Young, A. N., Berkel, T. D., Wallbruch, E., Mann, J., Park, Y. S., Hirshfield, L., & Hyderi, A. (2020). Empowering medical students as agents of curricular change: A value-added approach to student engagement in medical education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 9, 60-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-00547-2
  39. Goroshit, M., & Hen, M. (2021). Academic procrastination and academic performance: Do learning disabilities matter? Current Psychology, 40, 2490-2498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00183-3
  40. Greathead, S., Yates, R., Hill, V., Kenny, L., Croydon, A., & Pellicano, E. (2016). Supporting children with severe-to-profound learning difficulties and complex communication needs to make their views known: Observation tools and methods. Topics in Language Disorders, 36(3), 217-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000096
  41. Hakimi, N., Hakimi, M., Hejran, M., Quraishi, T., Qasemi, P., Ahmadi, L., Daudzai, M., & Ulusi, H. (2024). Challenges and opportunities of E-Learning for women's education in developing countries: Insights from Women Online University. EDUTREND: Journal of Emerging Issues and Trends in Education, 1(1), 57-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.59110/edutrend.310
  42. Hills, M., Overend, A., & Hildebrandt, S. (2022). Faculty perspectives on UDL: Exploring bridges and barriers for broader adoption in higher education. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(1), n1. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2022.1.13588
  43. Ismail, A., & Kuppusamy, K. S. (2022). Web accessibility investigation and identification of major issues of higher education websites with statistical measures: A case study of college websites. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 34(3), 901-911. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.03.011
  44. Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 10(1), 18-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
  45. Janeslätt, G., Ahlstrom, S. W., & Granlund, M. (2019). Intervention in timeâ€processing ability, daily time management and autonomy in children with intellectual disabilities aged 10-17 years-A cluster randomised trial. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 66(1), 110-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12547
  46. Jaysawal, N., & Saha, S. (2023). Role of education in women empowerment. International Journal of Applied Research, 9(4), 08-13. https://doi.org/10.22271/allresearch.2023.v9.i4a.10710
  47. Kabeer, N. (2002). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125
  48. Kanatelia, E. (2023). Transformative education and experience-based learning for refugee empowerment and peaceful coexistence in European society: Role-playing and drama simulation approaches. Epistēmēs Metron Logos, (10), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/eml.36130
  49. Kasim, N. N. M., & Khalid, F. (2016). Choosing the right Learning Management System (LMS) for the higher education institution context: A systematic review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5644
  50. Kent, M., Ellis, K., & Giles, M. (2018). Students with disabilities and eLearning in Australia: Experiences of accessibility and disclosure at Curtin University. TechTrends, 62 (8), 654-663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0337-y
  51. Khan, K., & Lal, P. (2023). Executive dysfunctions in different learning disabilities: A review. Journal of Indian Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 19(2), 126-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/09731342231179614
  52. Kilag, O. K., Miñoza, J., Comighud, E., Amontos, C., Damos, M., & Abendan, C. F. (2023). Empowering teachers: Integrating technology into livelihood education for a digital future. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(1), 30-41.
  53. Kimhur, B. (2020). How to apply the capability approach to housing policy? Concepts, theories and challenges. Housing, Theory and Society, 37(3), 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2019.1706630
  54. Kinash, S., Crichton, S., & Kim-Rupnow, W. S. (2004). A review of 2000-2003 literature at the intersection of online learning and disability. American Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), pp. 5-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1801_2
  55. Kormos, J., & Smith, A. M. (2023). Teaching languages to students with specific learning differences (Vol. 18). Channel View Publications.
  56. Laufer, M., Leiser, A., Deacon, B., Perrin de Brichambaut, P., Fecher, B., Kobsda, C., & Hesse, F. (2021). Digital higher education: a divider or bridge builder? Leadership perspectives on edtech in a COVID-19 reality. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00287-6
  57. Learning Disabilities Association of America (LDA). 2025. Core principles: What are learning disabilities? https://ldaamerica.org/info/core-principles-what-are-learning-disabilities/
  58. Lemmetty, S., & Collin, K. (2023). Self-direction. In V. Glaveanu (Ed.), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible (pp. 1456-1462), Springer International Publishing.
  59. Lewis, K. E., Sweeney, G., Thompson, G. M., & Adler, R. M. (2020). Integer number sense and notation: A case study of a student with a mathematics learning disability. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 59, 100797. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100797
  60. Lipka, O., Forkosh Baruch, A., & Meer, Y. (2019). Academic support model for post-secondary school students with learning disabilities: Student and instructor perceptions. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(2), 142-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1427151
  61. Loeng, S. (2020). Self-directed learning: A core concept in adult education. Education Research International, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020%2F3816132
  62. Logan, R. M., Johnson, C. E., & Worsham, J. W. (2020). Development of an e-learning module to facilitate student learning and outcomes. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 16(2), 139-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2020.10.007
  63. Luft, J. A., Jeong, S., Idsardi, R., & Gardner, G. (2022). Literature reviews, theoretical frameworks, and conceptual frameworks: An introduction for new biology education researchers. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 21(3), rm33. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-05-0134
  64. Lytra, N., & Drigas, A. (2021). STEAM education-metacognition-specific learning disabilities. Scientific Electronic Archives, 14(10), 41-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.36560/141020211442
  65. Mampaey, J. (2017). An organisational perspective on social exclusion in higher education: A case study. Education as Change, 21(3), 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1947-9417/2017/1492
  66. Matsuura, Y., & Jaeah, C. (2024). Dyslexia articles unboxed: Analyzing their readability level. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 45(3), e211-e216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001274
  67. Mayer, R. E. (2021). Evidence-based principles for how to design effective instructional videos. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(2), 229-240. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.03.007
  68. McKenzie, J., Karisa, A., Kahonde, C., & Tesni, S. (2021). Review of UDL in low-and middle-income countries. Including Disability in Education in Africa (IDEA). https://health.uct.ac.za/sites/default/files/content_migration/health_uct_ac_za/2024/files/UDL_review_report.pdf
  69. McNaughtan, J., Eicke, D., Thacker, R., & Freeman, S. (2022). Trust or self-determination: Understanding the role of tenured faculty empowerment and job satisfaction. The Journal of Higher Education, 93(1), 137-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.1935601
  70. McNicholl, A., Desmond, D., & Gallagher, P. (2023). Assistive technologies, educational engagement and psychosocial outcomes among students with disabilities in higher education. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 18(1), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1854874
  71. Mir, K. (2017). Design and development of online student support system. Pakistan Journal of Distance and Online Learning, 3(1), 1-8.
  72. Moll, K., Gobel, S. M., Gooch, D., Landerl, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2016). Cognitive risk factors for specific learning disorder: Processing speed, temporal processing, and working memory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(3), 272-281. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0022219414547221
  73. Moore, S. L., & Piety, P. J. (2022). Online learning ecosystems: Comprehensive planning and support for distance learners. Distance Education, 43(2), 179-203.
  74. Moore-Cherry, N., Healey, R., Nicholson, D. T., & Andrews, W. (2016). Inclusive partnership: Enhancing student engagement in geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(1), 84-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2015.1066316
  75. Moran, T. E., Gibbs, D. C., & Mernin, L. (2017). The empowerment model: Turning barriers into possibilities. Palaestra, 31(2).
  76. Muktamath, V. U., Hegde, P., & Chand, S. (2021). Types of specific learning disability. In S. Misciagna (Ed.). Learning Disabilities-Neurobiology, Assessment, Clinical Features and Treatments. IntechOpen.
  77. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). (2022). Learning disabilities. https://www.ninds.nih.gov/health-information/disorders/learning-disabilities#:~:text=Learning%20disabilities%20are%20disorders%20that,Direct%20attention
  78. Nave, L. (2021). Universal design for learning: UDL in online environments: The WHAT of learning. Journal of Developmental Education, 44(2), 30-32. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45381107
  79. Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press.
  80. Pearson, V., Lister, K., & Coughlan, T. (2019, November). Accessibility coordinators: A model for embedded, sustainable change towards inclusive higher education. In Proceedings of the 12th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI 2019), pp. 3127-3136. IATED. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2019.0798
  81. Perez-Escolar, M., & Canet, F. (2022). Research on vulnerable people and digital inclusion: Toward a consolidated taxonomical framework. Universal access in the information society, 22(3), 1059-1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00867-x
  82. Peters, L., de Beeck, H. O., & De Smedt, B. (2020). Cognitive correlates of dyslexia, dyscalculia and comorbid dyslexia/dyscalculia: Effects of numerical magnitude processing and phonological processing. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 107, 103806. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103806
  83. Peterson, R. L., McGrath, L. M., Willcutt, E. G., Keenan, J. M., Olson, R. K., & Pennington, B. F. (2021). How specific are learning disabilities? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(6), 466-483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420982981
  84. Phillips, A., Terras, K., Swinney, L., & Schneweis, C. (2012). Online disability accommodations: Faculty experiences at one public university. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 25(4), 331-344. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1002144.pdf
  85. Quinn, J. M., Wagner, R. K., Petscher, Y., Roberts, G., Menzel, A. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2020). Differential co-development of vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension for students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 608. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/edu0000382
  86. Rao, K. (2021). Inclusive instructional design: Applying UDL to online learning. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 10(1), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.51869/jaid2021101
  87. Reddick, C. G., Enriquez, R., Harris, R. J., & Sharma, B. (2020). Determinants of broadband access and affordability: An analysis of a community survey on the digital divide. Geraghty Cities, 106, 102904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102904
  88. Robeyns, I. (2006). The capability approach in practice. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 351-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00263.x
  89. Robinson, T. (2019). Using the technology acceptance model to examine technology acceptance of online learning technologies by non-traditional students. I-Manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.16.1.15826
  90. Å afárová, K., Mekyska, J., & ZvonÄák, V. (2021). Developmental dysgraphia: A new approach to diagnosis. The International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation, 28(1), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7920/CGP/v28i01/143-160
  91. Sanders, R. (2020). Digital inclusion, exclusion and participation. Glasgow: Iriss. https://www.iriss.org.uk/sites/default/files/2020-04/iriss_esss_outline_digital_inclusion_09042020_0.pdf
  92. Seale, J. (2012). When digital capital is not enough: Reconsidering the digital lives of disabled university students. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(3), 256-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2012.670644
  93. Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
  94. Seshadri, N. P., Agrawal, S., Singh, B. K., Geethanjali, B., Mahesh, V., & Pachori, R. B. (2023). EEG based classification of children with learning disabilities using shallow and deep neural network. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 82, 104553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104553
  95. Shafieisabet, N., & Haratifard, S. (2020). The empowerment of local tourism stakeholders and their perceived environmental effects for participation in sustainable development of tourism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 45, 486-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.10.007
  96. Sis, C. A., & Schumacher, M. (2024). Faculty and student views of accommodations: Does the diagnosis make a difference? International Journal of Education and Social Science 11(2).
  97. Slaughter, M. H., Lindstrom, J. H., & Anderson, R. (2022). Perceptions of extended time accommodations among postsecondary students with disabilities. Exceptionality, 30(4), 246-260.
  98. Smith, E. E., Kahlke, R., & Judd, T. (2020). Not just digital natives: Integrating technologies in professional education contexts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5689
  99. Smith, K. T., Monti, D., Mir, N., Peters, E., Tipirneni, R., & Politi, M. C. (2018). Access is necessary but not sufficient: Factors influencing delay and avoidance of health care services. MDM Policy & Practice, 3(1), 2381468318760298. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381468318760298
  100. Snowling, M. J., Hulme, C., & Nation, K. (2020). Defining and understanding dyslexia: past, present and future. Oxford Review of Education, 46(4), 501-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1765756
  101. Sowell, J. (2023). Making learning inclusive in digital learning environments. In English Teaching Forum (Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 2-13). US Department of State. Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Office of English Language Programs. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1383461.pdf
  102. Suarezâ€Balcazar, Y., Balcazar, F., Labbe, D., McDonald, K. E., Keys, C., Taylorâ€Ritzler, T., & Agner, J. (2023). Disability rights and empowerment: Reflections on AJCP research and a call to action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 72(3-4), 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12710
  103. Svensson, I., Nordstrom, T., Lindeblad, E., Gustafson, S., Bjorn, M., Sand, C., Bäck, G., & Nilsson, S. (2021). Effects of assistive technology for students with reading and writing disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 16(2), 196-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1646821
  104. Terras, K., Anderson, S., & Grave, S. (2020). Comparing disability accommodations in online courses: A cross-classification. Journal of Educators Online, 17(2).
  105. Terras, K., Leggio, J., & Phillips, A. (2015). Disability accommodations in online courses: The graduate student experience. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(3), 329-340.
  106. Terzoli, A., Sieborger, I., Tsietsi, M., & Gumbo, S. (2018). Digital inclusion: A model for e-infrastructure and e-services in developing countries. In e-Infrastructure and e-Services for Developing Countries: 9th International Conference, AFRICOMM 2017, Lagos, Nigeria, December 11-12, 2017, Proceedings 9, pp. 85-98. Springer International Publishing.
  107. Venkateswara, H., McDaniel, T., Tadayon, R., & Panchanathan, S. (2018). Person-centered technologies for individuals with disabilities: Empowerment through assistive and rehabilitative solutions. Technology & Innovation, 20(1-2), 117-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.21300/20.1-2.2018.117
  108. Vincent, L. & Chiwandire, D. (2019). Funding and inclusion in higher education institutions for students with disabilities. African Journal of Disability, 8(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v8i0.336
  109. Volker, M., & Doneys, P. (2021). Empowerment as one sees it: Assessment of empowerment by women participants of development projects. Development in Practice, 31(1), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2020.1828284
  110. Walker, M., & Mathebula, M. (2020). Low-income rural youth migrating to urban universities in South Africa: Opportunities and inequalities. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(8), 1193-1209. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1587705
  111. Wentz, B., Gorham, U., & Jaeger, P. T. (2023). Academic libraries and their legal obligation for content accessibility. First Monday, 28(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v28i1.12892
  112. Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506983