Vol. 30 No. 1 (2015)
Research Articles

Collaborative Online Teaching: A Model for Gerontological Social Work Education

Amy Elizabeth Fulton
University of Calgary Faculty of Social Work
Christine A. Walsh
University of Calgary Faculty of Social Work
Anna Azulai
Cari Gulbrandsen
University of Calgary Faculty of Social Work
Hongmei Tong
University of Calgary Faculty of Social Work

Published 2015-05-26


  • collaborative teaching,
  • team teaching,
  • gerontological social work,
  • online delivery,
  • mixed methods research

How to Cite

Fulton, A. E., Walsh, C. A., Azulai, A., Gulbrandsen, C., & Tong, H. (2015). Collaborative Online Teaching: A Model for Gerontological Social Work Education. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education Revue Internationale Du E-Learning Et La Formation à Distance, 30(1). Retrieved from https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/917


Social work students and faculty are increasingly embracing online education and team teaching. Yet models to support these activities have not been adequately developed. This paper describes how a team of instructors (a senior faculty member, three doctoral students, and a post-doctoral fellow) developed, delivered and evaluated an undergraduate gerontological social work course using a collaborative online teaching and learning model. Our findings suggest that the course model served to: (a) facilitate undergraduate students’ use of higher order learning (reflection, reflexivity and application of knowledge to practice) and reduce ageism; (b) increase instructional skill among doctoral students and (c) provide the opportunity for gerontology training to undergraduate social work students across a large geographical area.


  1. Allan, L.J., & Johnson, J.A. (2008). Undergraduate attitudes toward the elderly: The role of knowledge, contact and aging anxiety. Educational Gerontology, 35(1), 1-14. 2.
  2. Ash, S. L., & Clayton, P. H. (2004). The articulated learning: An approach to guided reflection and assessment. Innovative Higher Education, 29(2), 137-154. 3.
  3. Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14. 4.
  4. Barnett-Queen, T., Blair, R., & Merrick, M. (2005). Student perspectives of online discussions: Strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 23(3/4), 229-244.
  5. Bay, U., & Macfarlane, S. (2011). Teaching critical reflection: A tool for transformative learning in social work? Social Work Education, 30(7), 745-758.
  6. Bergel, D. P. (2006). Baccalaureate social work education and courses on aging: The disconnect. The Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 12(1), 105-118.
  7. Boswell, S. (2012). “Old people are cranky”: Helping professional trainees’ knowledge, attitudes, aging anxiety, and interest in working with older adults. Educational Gerontology, 38(7), 465- 472.
  8. Charmaz, K. (2006.) Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  9. Christensen, K., Doblhammer, G., Rau, R., & Vaupel, J. W. (2009). Aging populations: The challenge ahead. Lancet, 374, 1196-1208.
  10. Colwill, E., & Boyd, R. (2008). Teaching without a mask? Collaborative teaching as feminist practice. NWSA Journal, 20(2), 216-246.
  11. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  12. Cummings, S. M., Kim, M. C., Galambos, C., & Wilson, E. (2006). Impact of an infusion model on social work students' aging knowledge, attitudes, and interests. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 47(3-4), 173-186.
  13. D’Cruz, H., Gillingham, P., & Melendez, S. (2007). Reflexivity, its meaning and relevance for social work: A critical review of the literature. British Journal of Social Work, 37(1), 73-90.
  14. Duch B.J., Groh S.E., & Allen, D.E. (2001). (Eds). The power of problem-based learning: A practical 'how to' for teaching undergraduate courses in any discipline. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publications.
  15. Fein, A. D., & Logan, M. C. (2003). Preparing instructors for online instruction. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2003(100), 45-55. Fulton file:///Users/alan/Documents/Work/Projects/JDE/HTML/Vol22/Fulton.html[2015-05-26, 2:51:32 PM]
  16. Fraboni, M., Saltstone, R., & Hughes, S. (1990). The Fraboni scale of ageism (FSA): An attempt at a more precise measure of ageism. Canadian Journal on Aging, 9, 56-66.
  17. Gravestock, P. & Gregor-Greenleaf, E. (2008). Student course evaluations: Research, models and trends. Toronto, ON: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.
  18. Gonclaves, D.C. (2009). From loving grandma to working with older adults: Promoting positive attitudes towards aging. Educational Gerontology, 35(3), 202-225.
  19. Gulbrandsen, C.L., Walsh, C.A., Fulton, A.E., Azulai, A., & Tong, H. (2015). Evaluating asynchronous discussion as social constructivist pedagogy in an online undergraduate gerontological social work course. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 10(4), 94-111.
  20. Hartford Institute. (2011). Why should I consider a career in gero social work? Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/CentersInitiatives/GeroEdCenter/Students/LearnMore/WhyGeroSocialWork.aspx
  21. Hash, K. M., & Tower, L. E. (2010). The development and evaluation of online learning modules to deliver lifespan content in Human Behavior in Social Environment Courses. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 20, 379-392.
  22. Hick, S. (2010). Social work in Canada: An introduction (3rd ed.). Toronto, ON: Thompson Educational.
  23. Hirst, S. P., Lane, A. M., & Stares, B. (2012). Gerontological content in Canadian nursing and social work programs. Canadian Geriatrics Journal, 15(1), 8.
  24. Hooyman, N. & Peter, S. (2006). Creating aging-enriched social work education: A process of curricular and organizational change. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 48(1-2), 9-29.
  25. Hylton, M.E. (2006). Online versus classroom-based instruction: A comparative study of learning outcomes within a diversity course. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 11(2), 1-22.
  26. Jennings, D. (2006). PBLonline: A framework for collaborative e-learning. In M. Savin-Barden & K. Wilkie (Eds.), Problem-based learning online (pp. 105-126). New York, NY: Open University Press.
  27. Kalavar, J. M. (2001). Examining ageism: Do male and female college students differ? Educational Gerontology, 27(6), 507-513.
  28. Koh, M.H., & Hill, J.R. (2009). Student perceptions of group work in an online course: Benefits and challenges. Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 69-92.
  29. Kurzman, P.A. (2013). The evolution of distance learning and online education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4-5), 331-338.
  30. Land, R., & Bayne, S. (2006). Issues in cyberspace education. In M. Savin-Barden & K. Wilkie (Eds.), Problem-based learning online (pp. 14-23). New York, NY: Open University Press.
  31. Leavitt, M.C. (2006). Team teaching: Benefits and challenges. Speaking of Teaching, 16(1), 1-4. Retrieved from http://web.stanford.edu/dept/CTL/Newsletter/teamteaching.pdf
  32. Lou, Y., & MacGregor, S.K. (2004). Enhancing project-based learning through online betweengroup collaboration. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(4-6), 419-440.
  33. Lun, M.W. (2012). Students’ knowledge of aging and career preferences. Educational Gerontology, 38(1), 70-79.
  34. Madoc-Jones, I., & Parrott, L. (2005). Virtual social work education—Theory and experience. Social Work Education, 24(7), 755-768.
  35. Majeski, R., & Stover, M. (2007). Theoretically based pedagogical strategies leading to deep learning in asynchronous online gerontology courses. Educational Gerontology, 33(3), 171-185.
  36. Mandernach, B.J., Gonzales, R.M., & Garrett, A.L. (2006). An examination of online instructor presence via threaded discussion participation. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2(4), 248-260. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org
  37. McAlister, C. (2013). A process evaluation of an online BSW program: Getting the student perspective. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4/5), 514-530.
  38. Moore, B. (2008). Using technology to promote communities of practice (CoP) in social work education. Social Work Education, 27(6), 592-600.
  39. Morley, C., & Dunstan, J. (2013). Critical reflection: A response to neoliberal challenges to field education? Social Work Education, 32(2), 141-156.
  40. North, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). An inconvenienced youth? Ageism and its potential Fulton file:///Users/alan/Documents/Work/Projects/JDE/HTML/Vol22/Fulton.html[2015-05-26, 2:51:32 PM] intergenerational roots. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 982– 997.
  41. O’Neil, M., & Jensen, J. (2014). Comparison of student outcomes in a campus and a distributed learning class. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 32(3), 186-200.
  42. Paily, M. U. (2013). Creating constructivist learning environment: Role of “Web 2.0” technology. International Forum of Teaching and Studies, 9(1), 39-50.
  43. Palmer, B. (2006, March 15). Professors preach 10 commandments of team teaching: Joshua Landy, Lanier Anderson offer ‘thou shalts’ of the craft. Stanford Report. Retrieved from http://news.stanford.edu/news/2006/march15/team-031506.html
  44. Palmore, E. B. (1988). The Facts on Aging Quiz: A handbook of uses and results. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
  45. Palmore, E. B. (1998). The Facts on Aging Quiz: A handbook of uses and results (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
  46. Palmore, E. B. (2005). Facts on Aging Mental Health Quiz. In
  47. Encyclopedia of Ageism. (pp. 138- 147). Binghampton, NY: Haworth Press, Inc.
  48. Petracchi, H., Mallinger, G, Engel, R., Rishel, C.W., & Washburn, C. (2005). Evaluating the efficacy of traditional and web-assisted instruction in an undergraduate social work practice class. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 23(3/4), 299-310.
  49. Popil, I. (2011). Promotion of critical thinking by using case studies as teaching method. Nurse Education Today, 31(2), 204-207.
  50. Preves, S., & Stephenson, D. (2009). The classroom as stage: Impression management in collaborative teaching. Teaching in Sociology, 37(3), 245-256.
  51. Roberts, T.S., & McInnerney, J.M. (2007). Seven problems of online group learning (and their solutions). Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 257-268.
  52. Rochford, L., & Borchert, P. (2011). Assessing higher-level learning: Developing rubrics for case analysis. Journal of Education for Business, 86(5), 258-265.
  53. Rupp, D. E., Vodanovich, S. J., & Credé, M. (2005). The multidimensional nature of ageism: Construct validity and group differences. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(3), 335-362.
  54. Scribner-MacLean, M., & Miller, H. (2011). Strategies for success for online co-teaching. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 419-425. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org
  55. Sellers, D.M., Bolender, B.C., & Crocker, A.B. (2010). Beliefs about aging: Implications for future educational programming. Educational Gerontology, 36(10-11), 1022-1042.
  56. Sitzmann, T., Ely, K., Bell, B. S., & Bauer, K. (2010). The effects of technical difficulties on learning and attrition during online training. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(3), 281- 292.
  57. Truemper, C. (2004). Using scoring rubrics to facilitate assessment and evaluation of graduatelevel nursing students. The Journal of Nursing Education, 43(12), 562-564.
  58. University of Calgary. (n.d.). About course ratings. Retrieved from http://www.ucalgary.ca/usri/welcome/about
  59. University of Saskatchewan. (n.d.). Online course evaluations and response rates. Retrieved from http://www.usask.ca/ipa/documents/online_course_evals.pdf
  60. Van der Elst, E., Deschodt, M., Welsch, M., Milisen, K., & B.D. de Casterle. (2014). Internal consistency and construct validity assessment of a revised Facts on Aging Quiz for Flemish nursing students: An exploratory study. BMC Geriatrics, 14(1), 128-137.
  61. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  62. Walsh, C. A., & Baynton, M. (2012). Distance education in social work: An evaluation of an undergraduate course in family violence. International Journal of Higher Education, 1(1), 148- 159.
  63. Walters, K., & Misra, J. (2013). Bringing collaborative teaching into doctoral programs: Faculty and graduate student co-teaching as experiential training. The American Sociologist, 44(3), 292-301.
  64. Webb, S., Chonody, J., Ranzijn, R., Bryan, J., & Owen, M. (2015). A qualitative investigation of gerontological practice: The views of social work and psychology students, faculty and practitioners. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, Advanced Online Access.
  65. Webster, J., & Hackley, P. (1997). Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Fulton file:///Users/alan/Documents/Work/Projects/JDE/HTML/Vol22/Fulton.html[2015-05-26, 2:51:32 PM] Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1282-1309.
  66. Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 15-25.
  67. Wyss, V., Freedman, D., & Siebert, C. (2014). The development of a discussion rubric for online courses: Standardizing expectations of graduate students in online scholarly discussions. Tech Trends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 58(2), 999-108.
  68. Xu, H., & Morris, L. (2007). Collaborative course development for online courses. Innovative Higher Education, 32(1), 35-47.
  69. Zapf, M., Jerome, L., & Williams, M. (2011). Team teaching in social work: Sharing power with Bachelor of Social Work students. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 31(1), 38-52.